Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 3.432
1.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 25(4): 1391-1409, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680001

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare cancer that develops in soft tissue, particularly skeletal muscle tissue and occasionally hollow organs like the bladder or uterus. Vincristine (VCR) is the main therapy used in treatment of RMS, it is an alkaloid produced from vinca and it is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in pediatric oncology for the treatment of a number of tumors. The CYP3A5 enzyme is responsible for vincristine metabolism. The effect of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphism on the efficacy and toxicity of VCR on RMS patients still needs further research. METHODS: Genotyping for CYP3A5 SNPs rs776746, rs10264272 and rs41303343 was performed using Taqman Real-Time PCR assays in a retrospective cohort study of 150 RMS pediatric patients treated with vincristine. The relationship between these genotypes and RMS survival was then examined. RESULTS: We found that patients with CYP3A5*3/*3 had the highest incidence of vincristine-induced neuropathy reaching 61.3%. Patients with CYP3A5*1/*3, CYP3A5*3/*6 and the normal metabolizers with CYP3A5*1/*1 had frequencies of 22%, 10.7%, and 4.7%. patients with the lowest frequency of 1.3% were those with the CYP3A5*1/*6 genotype. There was no correlation between the genotypes of CYP3A5*3, CYP3A5*6, CYP3A5*7, and RMS survival. Initial risk, metastasis, response, convulsions, unsteady gait and hepatotoxicity grade had a significant effect on overall survival with p<0.05. CONCLUSION: CYP3A5*1/*1 have less severe vincristine-induced neuropathy than CYP3A5 *1/*3, CYP3A5 *1/*6 and CYP3A5 *3/*3, CYP3A5 *3/*6. There is a significant influence of CYP3A5 mutation on neuropathy grade and assist of ADL as a part of neurotoxicity.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Rhabdomyosarcoma , Vincristine , Humans , Vincristine/adverse effects , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/genetics , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Rhabdomyosarcoma/genetics , Rhabdomyosarcoma/drug therapy , Rhabdomyosarcoma/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Egypt , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Survival Rate , Genotype , Infant , Adolescent
2.
Breast Cancer ; 31(3): 409-416, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453739

BACKGROUND: Characteristics of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) could be different between paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel. The purpose of this prospective observational multicenter cohort study was to compare tri-weekly nab-paclitaxel to weekly standard paclitaxel regarding the severity, onset and recovery of sensory and motor PN in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer who were scheduled to receive standard weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) or tri-weekly nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2) at institutions in our multicenter group were eligible for this study. Sensory and motor PN were evaluated every 3 weeks until PN improved for up to one year using patient-reported outcome. RESULTS: Between February 2011 and April 2013, 115 patients were enrolled, including 57 and 58 in the paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel groups, respectively. The incidence of moderate or severe sensory PN was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.40). The incidence of moderate or higher motor PN was more frequent in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group (p = 0.048). The median period for demonstrating PN were shorter in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group (sensory, p = 0.003; motor, p = 0.001). The recovery of motor PN was slower in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group (p = 0.035), while the recovery period of sensory PN was not statistically different. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel induced sensory PN sooner than paclitaxel, and no difference was observed in the severity and recovery duration between the two agents. Motor PN was more severe, started sooner, and improved over a longer period in the nab-paclitaxel-treated patients than in the paclitaxel-treated patients.


Albumins , Breast Neoplasms , Paclitaxel , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Humans , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Albumins/administration & dosage , Albumins/adverse effects , Albumins/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use
3.
Cancer Med ; 12(19): 19480-19490, 2023 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37732486

INTRODUCTION: Vincristine is an integral component of treatment for children with cancer. Its main dose-limiting side effect is vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN). The VINCA trial was a randomized controlled trial that explored the effect of 1-hour infusion compared with push injection of vincristine on the development of VIPN in children with cancer. The short-term outcomes (median follow-up 9 months) showed that there was no difference in VIPN between the randomization groups. However, 1-hour infusion was less toxic in children who also received azoles. We now report the results of the final analyses (median follow-up 20 months), which includes treatment outcome as a secondary objective (follow-up 3 years). METHODS: VIPN was measured 1-7 times per participant using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and the pediatric-modified total neuropathy score. Poisson mixed model and logistic generalized estimating equation analysis for repeated measures were performed. RESULTS: Forty-five participants per randomization group were included. There was no significant effect of 1-hour infusion compared with push injection on VIPN. In participants receiving concurrent azoles, the total CTCAE score was significantly lower in the one-hour group (rate ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.80, p = 0.003). Four patients in the one-hour group and one patient in the push group relapsed. Two patients in the one-hour group died. CONCLUSION: 1-hour infusion of vincristine is not protective against VIPN. However, in patients receiving concurrent azoles, 1-hour infusion may be less toxic. The difference in treatment outcome is most likely the result of differences in risk profile.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Neoplasms , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Child , Humans , Vincristine/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Azoles/adverse effects
4.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 62(11): 1589-1597, 2023 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37715926

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Side effects of irinotecan treatment can be dose limiting and may impair quality of life. In this study, we investigated the correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding enzymes involved in the irinotecan metabolism and transport, outside UGT1A1, and irinotecan-related toxicity. We focused on carboxylesterases, which are involved in formation of the active metabolite SN-38 and on drug transporters. METHODS: Patients who provided written informed consent at the Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute to the Code Geno study (local protocol: MEC02-1002) or the IRI28-study (NTR-6612) were enrolled in the study and were genotyped for 15 SNPs in the genes CES1, CES2, SLCO1B1, ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2. RESULTS: From 299 evaluable patients, 86 patients (28.8%) developed severe irinotecan-related toxicity. A significantly higher risk of toxicity was seen in ABCG2 c.421C>A variant allele carriers (P = 0.030, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.06-3.34). Higher age was associated with all grade diarrhea (P = 0.041, OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06). In addition, CES1 c.1165-41C>T and CES1 n.95346T>C variant allele carriers had a lower risk of all-grade thrombocytopenia (P = 0.024, OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.90 and P = 0.018, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that ABCG2 and CES1 SNPs might be used as predictive markers for irinotecan-induced toxicity.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Camptothecin , Humans , Irinotecan/adverse effects , Camptothecin/adverse effects , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Quality of Life , Genotype , Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Liver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1/genetics
5.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 154: 157-168, 2023 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37633123

OBJECTIVE: Vincristine is a mainstay treatment for paediatric cancers, particularly acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), with common toxicity including vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN). The present study comprehensively assessed VIPN outcomes in patients receiving vincristine treatment for ALL. METHODS: Children diagnosed with ALL commencing vincristine treatment were prospectively evaluated (baseline, post-induction, pre-reinduction, post-reinduction, follow-up). VIPN was examined clinically using the Balis sensory/motor scale, neurophysiologically using axonal excitability techniques and quality-of-life using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were recruited to this study (age = 6.8 ± 4.4; 61.3% female). Incidence of motor VIPN (motor Balis grade > 0) symptoms were higher than sensory VIPN (sensory Balis grade > 0) at post-induction (92.0% vs 36.0%) and post-reinduction (81.8% vs 22.7%) vincristine treatment. Neurophysiological assessment also demonstrated greater change in motor axonal excitability parameters compared to sensory parameters including changes in depolarising threshold electrotonus (P < 0.0125), superexcitability and subexcitability parameters (all P < 0.0125). Follow-up assessment demonstrated persisting VIPN symptoms with reduced quality-of-life scores compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and neurophysiological evaluation of VIPN suggests vincristine produces a motor-prominent sensorimotor neuropathy in children which persisted at follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: VIPN signs and symptoms develop early in the treatment course, in line with axonal excitability profiles. Early detection of significant nerve changes may support timely implementation of neuroprotection strategies.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Child , Humans , Female , Child, Preschool , Male , Vincristine/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/chemically induced
6.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 79(9): 1229-1238, 2023 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438439

PURPOSE: An international shortage of ranitidine led to adjustments in premedication regimens for paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in early October 2019. In this study, we implemented and evaluated an anti-allergic protocol without histamine-2 antagonists (H2As) and aimed to assess the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to the different premedication regimens used. METHODS: We conducted a single-center observational retrospective study of paclitaxel administrations (7173 administrations in 831 patients). Between January 2019 and December 2020, all allergies reported were recorded. A mixed logistic regression model was implemented to predict the risk of allergy at each injection and to account for repeated administration per patient. RESULTS: A total of 27 HSRs occurred in 24 patients. No protective effect was observed for H2A when comparing paclitaxel injections with H2A premedication versus without H2A (OR = 1.12, p = 0.84). There was also no significant difference in risk of HSR for famotidine versus ranitidine (OR = 0.79, p = 0.78). However, the risk of HSRs was significantly lower for paclitaxel injections with corticosteroids than for those without (OR = 0.08, p = 0.03). In addition, the risk of HSR was significantly higher for the first, second, or third paclitaxel injections than for the subsequent injections (OR = 10.1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We did not find substantial evidence of an increased risk of HSR due to the absence of H2A in the premedication protocols for paclitaxel. Thus, in contrary to the existing literature on paclitaxel, our findings support the use of a premedication protocol without H2A.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Drug Hypersensitivity , Histamine H2 Antagonists , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Paclitaxel , Taxoids , Histamine H2 Antagonists/supply & distribution , Incidence , Humans , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Taxoids/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Protocols , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Premedication
7.
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi ; 25(5): 470-475, 2023 May 15.
Article Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37272172

OBJECTIVES: To study the characteristics of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the factors influencing the development of VIPN. METHODS: The children with ALL, aged 1-18 years, who were treated with CCCG-ALL2015 or CCCG-ALL2020 regimen in the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 2018 to February 2022 were enrolled as subjects. According to the influence of age on risk, the children were divided into 1-10 years group with 91 children and >10 years group with 29 children. VIPN was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (5th edition), and the incidence rate, severity, and type of VIPN were compared between different groups. RESULTS: A total of 120 children were enrolled in this study, among whom 56 (46.7%) developed VIPN. The >10 years group had a significantly higher incidence rate of VIPN than the 1-10 years group (69% vs 40%, P<0.05). Among the 56 children with VIPN, 12 (21%) had grade 3 VIPN or above, and 44 (79%) had grade 2 VIPN. There were 77 cases of autonomic nerve symptoms (59.7%), 42 cases of peripheral nerve injury (32.5%), and 10 cases of cranial nerve injury (7.8%). There were no significant differences in the severity and type of VIPN between the groups with different ages, sexes, degrees of risk, or treatment regimens (P>0.05). The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that age is the influencing factor for the occurrence of VIPN (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a relatively high incidence rate of VIPN in children with ALL, with the highest incidence rate of autonomic nervous symptoms. The incidence of VIP in children over 10 years old is relatively high.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Child , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Vincristine/adverse effects , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent
8.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 65: 102338, 2023 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321128

PURPOSE: To mitigate side effects of conventional cancer care and improve quality of life, many patients with breast cancer in German-speaking countries opt for mistletoe therapy in addition to standard treatment. To understand the value for users, we evaluated the domain "Patient and Social aspects" in a health technology assessment on complementary mistletoe therapy in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Fifteen electronic databases and the internet were searched. Qualitative studies were analyzed using qualitative content analysis; quantitative studies were systematically summarized in evidence tables. RESULTS: Seventeen studies out of 1203 screened publications with 4765 patients and 869 healthcare professionals were included in the review. The median proportion of patients using mistletoe therapy was 26.7% (range: 7.3-46.3%). Predictors for use were younger age and higher educational level. Main reasons for patients' use of mistletoe therapy were to leave nothing untried and to be actively involved in the treatment process. Reasons against use were related to a lack of knowledge or uncertainty regarding effectiveness and safety. Physicians mainly aimed to support the patient's physical condition as main reason for use and a lack of resources and knowledge as main reason against use. CONCLUSION: Mistletoe therapy was commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer despite a lack of scientific knowledge among patients and physicians. Transparent communication on motivation for use and its potential effect enables realistic expectations. Relatively small samples of mistletoe therapy users limit the representativeness and validity of our results.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Breast Neoplasms , Mistletoe , Viscum album , Humans , Female , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Phytotherapy/adverse effects , Phytotherapy/methods , Quality of Life , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
9.
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers ; 27(5): 133-141, 2023 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37257181

Background: There is extensive interindividual variability in response and tolerance to anticancer drugs. This heterogeneity provides a major limitation to the "rational" use of cytotoxic drugs, and it becomes a major problem in oncology giving a narrow therapeutic window with a vital risk. Among these anticancer drugs, irinotecan can cause dose-limiting toxicities, commonly diarrhea and neutropenia. Interaction among pathways of activation/inactivation (UGT1A1) and hepatobiliary transport of irinotecan and its metabolites could, in part, explain its interindividual variability. The objective of this study was to perform an exploratory analysis to evaluate the correlation between the genetic polymorphisms of UGT1A1 and ABCC2 with the different toxicities associated with irinotecan treatment. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five patients with solid cancers were included, all were administered an irinotecan-based regimen in both Mission Bay Medical Center; and Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital from May 2016 to December 2016. The patients' genotyping was performed for both the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, and the ABCC2 - 1549G>A, and ABCC2 - 1249G>A single nucleotide polymorphism. Comparisons among qualitative data were assessed using the χ2-test, and Fisher's exact test in the case of small group sizes. Results: Diarrhea was observed in 40 patients (53.3%), among them only 9 patients had high grades diarrhea (grades III and IV). Grades III/IV of nausea were more frequently associated with the ABCC2-1549 AA genotype (83.3% p = 0.004) in patients with colorectal cancer. In pancreatic cancer, a significant absence of diarrhea grades III-IV was noted in patients with the ABCC2 1249 GG genotype compared to the other ABCC2 1249 genotypes.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Antineoplastic Agents , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Diarrhea/genetics , Diarrhea/drug therapy , Genotype , Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics , Irinotecan/adverse effects , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
10.
J Biochem Mol Toxicol ; 37(5): e23326, 2023 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36808657

Our experimental objective was to investigate the hepatotoxic effect of vincristine (VCR) administration in rats and determined whether combined therapy with Quercetin (Quer) ensured protection. Five groups with seven rats each were used for this purpose, and experimental groups were formulated as follows: Control group; Quer group; VCR group; VCR plus Quer 25 group; VCR plus Quer 50 group. The results showed that VCR significantly increased the activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) enzymes. Besides, VCR caused considerable increases in the malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, along with significant decreases in reduced glutathione levels, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase enzyme activities in the rat livers. Quer treatment in VCR toxicity markedly decreased the activity of ALT, AST, ALP enzymes, and MDA contents and enhanced the activities of antioxidant enzymes. The results also showed that VCR significantly increased the levels of NF-kB, STAT3, and the expression of caspase 3, Bax, and MAP LC3 and decreased the expression of Bcl2 and levels of Nrf2, HO-1, SIRT1, and PGC-1α. Compared to the VCR group, Quer treatment exhibited significantly lower levels of NF-kB, STAT3, and the expression of caspase 3, Bax, and MAP LC3, and higher levels of Nrf2, HO-1, SIRT1, and PGC-1α. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that Quer could alleviate the harmful effects of VCR via activation of NRf2/HO-1 and SIRT1/PGC-1α pathways, and via attenuation of oxidative stress, apoptosis, autophagy, and NF-kB/STAT3 pathways.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , Quercetin , Vincristine , Animals , Rats , Vincristine/adverse effects , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/blood , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/drug therapy , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/veterinary , Quercetin/administration & dosage , Liver/chemistry , Liver/enzymology , Liver/pathology , Caspase 3/metabolism , bcl-2-Associated X Protein/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects
11.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 54(2): 589-599, 2023 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35710870

PURPOSE: The variability on irinotecan (IRI) pharmacokinetics and toxicity has been attributed mostly to genetic variations in the UGT1A1 gene, responsible for conjugation of the active metabolite SN-38. Also, CYP3A mediates the formation of inactive oxidative metabolites of IRI. The association between the occurrence of severe adverse events, pharmacokinetics parameters, and UGT1A1 and CYP3A4 predicted phenotypes was evaluated, as the evaluation of [SN-38]/IRI dose ratio as predictor of severe adverse events. METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing IRI therapy were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were collected 15 min after the end of drug the infusion, for IRI, SN-38, SN-38G, bilirubin concentrations measurements, and UGT1A1 and CYP3A genotype estimation. Data on adverse event was reported. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (36.5%) developed grade 3/4 adverse events. A total of 9.8% (n = 4) of the patients had UGT1A1 reduced activity phenotype, and 48.7% (n = 20) had UGT1A1 and 63.4% (n = 26) CYP3A intermediary phenotypes. Severe neutropenia and diarrhea were more prevalent in patients with reduced UGT1A1 in comparison with functional metabolism (50% and 75% versus 0% and 13%, respectively). SN-38 levels and its concentrations adjusted by IRI dose were significantly correlated to toxicity (rs = 0.31 (p = 0.05) and rs = 0.425 (p < 0.01)). The [SN-38]/IRI dose ratio had a ROC curve of 0.823 (95% CI 0.69-0.956) to detect any severe adverse event and 0.833 (95% CI 0.694-0.973) to detect severe diarrhea. The cut-off of 0.075 ng mL-1 mg-1 had 100% sensitivity and 65.7% specificity to predict severe diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Our data confirmed the relevance of the pre-emptive genotypic information of UGT1A1. The [SN-38]/IRI ratio, measured 15 min after the end of the IRI infusion, was a strong predictor of severe toxicity and could be applied to minimize the burden of patients after IRI administration.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Neoplasms , Humans , Irinotecan/adverse effects , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/therapeutic use , Genotype , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Camptothecin , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/genetics
12.
Article Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-981980

OBJECTIVES@#To study the characteristics of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the factors influencing the development of VIPN.@*METHODS@#The children with ALL, aged 1-18 years, who were treated with CCCG-ALL2015 or CCCG-ALL2020 regimen in the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 2018 to February 2022 were enrolled as subjects. According to the influence of age on risk, the children were divided into 1-10 years group with 91 children and >10 years group with 29 children. VIPN was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (5th edition), and the incidence rate, severity, and type of VIPN were compared between different groups.@*RESULTS@#A total of 120 children were enrolled in this study, among whom 56 (46.7%) developed VIPN. The >10 years group had a significantly higher incidence rate of VIPN than the 1-10 years group (69% vs 40%, P<0.05). Among the 56 children with VIPN, 12 (21%) had grade 3 VIPN or above, and 44 (79%) had grade 2 VIPN. There were 77 cases of autonomic nerve symptoms (59.7%), 42 cases of peripheral nerve injury (32.5%), and 10 cases of cranial nerve injury (7.8%). There were no significant differences in the severity and type of VIPN between the groups with different ages, sexes, degrees of risk, or treatment regimens (P>0.05). The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that age is the influencing factor for the occurrence of VIPN (P>0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#There is a relatively high incidence rate of VIPN in children with ALL, with the highest incidence rate of autonomic nervous symptoms. The incidence of VIP in children over 10 years old is relatively high.


Child , Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Vincristine/adverse effects
13.
Cancer Immunol Res ; 10(11): 1299-1308, 2022 11 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36083496

Cytotoxic agents synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors and improve outcomes for patients with several cancer types. Nonetheless, a parallel increase in the incidence of dose-limiting side effects, such as peripheral neuropathy, is often observed. Here, we investigated the role of the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis in the modulation of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. We found that human and mouse neural tissues, including the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), expressed basal levels of PD-1 and PD-L1. During the development of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy, an increase in PD-L1 expression was observed in macrophages from the DRG. This effect depended on Toll-like receptor 4 activation by paclitaxel. Furthermore, PD-L1 inhibited pain behavior triggered by paclitaxel or formalin in mice, suggesting that PD-1/PD-L1 signaling attenuates peripheral neuropathy development. Consistent with this, we observed that the combined use of anti-PD-L1 plus paclitaxel increased mechanical allodynia and chronic neuropathy development induced by single agents. This effect was associated with higher expression of inflammatory markers (Tnf, Il6, and Cx3cr1) in peripheral nervous tissue. Together, these results suggest that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors enhance paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain by suppressing PD-1/PD-L1 antinociceptive signaling.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Neuralgia , Rats , Humans , Mice , Animals , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Neuralgia/chemically induced , Neuralgia/metabolism , Paclitaxel , Analgesics/adverse effects
14.
Mediators Inflamm ; 2022: 1567210, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36164389

Paclitaxel (PTX) is a commonly used antitumor drug. Approximately 80% of all patients receiving PTX chemotherapy develop chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), limiting the use of PTX. Moreover, CIPN responds poorly to conventional analgesics. Experimental evidence suggests that the neuroinflammatory response plays an essential role in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN). Previous studies have confirmed that dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuron necroptosis and accompanying inflammation are linked with PIPN; however, the potential upstream regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. Preclinical studies have also established that macrophage infiltration in the DRG is associated with PIPN. TNF-α released by activated macrophages is the primary regulatory signal of necroptosis. In this study, we established a rat model of PIPN via quartic PTX administration (accumulated dose: 8 mg/kg, i.p.). The regulatory effect of macrophage infiltration on necroptosis in PIPN was observed using a macrophage scavenging agent (clodronate disodium). The results showed that PTX increased macrophage infiltration and the levels of TNF-α and IL-1ß in the DRG. PTX also upregulated the levels of necroptosis-related proteins, including receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIP3) and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) in DRG neurons and promoted MLKL phosphorylation, resulting in neuronal necrosis and hyperalgesia. In contrast, clodronate disodium effectively removed macrophages, reduced the levels of RIP3, MLKL, and pMLKL, and decreased the number of necrotic cells in the DRG of PIPN rats, alleviating the behavioral pain abnormalities. These results suggest that PTX promotes macrophage infiltration, which results in the release of TNF-α and IL-1ß in the DRG and the initiation of neuronal necroptosis via the RIP3/MLKL pathway, ultimately leading to neuropathic pain.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Ganglia, Spinal , Macrophage Activation , Macrophages , Necroptosis , Neuralgia , Paclitaxel , Protein Kinases , Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Clodronic Acid/pharmacology , Ganglia, Spinal/drug effects , Ganglia, Spinal/pathology , Inflammation/chemically induced , Inflammation/pathology , Macrophages/drug effects , Macrophages/immunology , Necroptosis/immunology , Necrosis , Neuralgia/chemically induced , Neuralgia/metabolism , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Rats , Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism
15.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 140(9): 880-884, 2022 09 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35951320

Importance: Taxane-based chemotherapy agents, such as docetaxel and paclitaxel, are used for treating a wide range of cancers. Although much has been published on adverse events related to taxanes, data on ocular outcomes with these very important drugs are scant. Objective: To quantify the risk of 3 mutually exclusive ocular adverse events of epiphora, cystoid macular edema (CME), and optic neuropathy with taxane-based chemotherapy agents by undertaking a large pharmacoepidemiologic study. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study design used a private health-claims database from the US that captures health information of more than 150 million enrollees. The study team created a cohort of new users of women with cancer who were taking taxane-based chemotherapy (docetaxel or paclitaxel) and new users of tamoxifen as controls. Study members were observed to the first incidence of each of the 3 mutually exclusive outcomes. An analysis of taxane-only users was also undertaken. Exposure: Tamoxifen (unexposed) and taxanes (ie, paclitaxel and docetaxel) as the exposed. Main Outcomes and Measures: First diagnosis of (1) epiphora, (2) cystoid macular edema (CME), or (3) optic neuropathy ascertained using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Ninth Revision or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Results: Among the 18 219 users in the epiphora analysis and optic neuropathy analysis, there were 1824 taxane users (paclitaxel and docetaxel) (age, mean [SD], 62.1 [12.7] years) and 16 395 tamoxifen users (age, mean [SD], 54.6 [12.8] years), respectively. The crude hazard ratio (HR) for epiphora was 5.55 (95% CI, 2.99-10.29) and adjusted HR was 5.15 (95% CI, 2.79-9.54). For optic neuropathy, the crude HR was 4.43 (95% CI, 1.10-17.82) and the adjusted HR was 4.44 (95% CI, 1.04-18.87). Among the 18 433 users in the CME analysis, there were 1909 taxane users (paclitaxel and docetaxel) (age, mean [SD], 62.5 years) and 16 524 tamoxifen users (age, mean [SD], 54.6 years). The crude HR for CME comparing taxane users with tamoxifen users was 1.37 (95% CI, 0.72-2.60) and adjusted HR was 1.33 (95% CI, 0.70-2.53). The HRs for epiphora and CME in the taxane cohort during the time of exposure compared with the period prior to use of the drugs were 2.86 (95% CI, 1.11-7.39) and 2.27 (95% CI, 0.68-7.54), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In a cohort of women who were using taxane chemotherapy agents, there was an association with elevated risk for epiphora, CME, and optic neuropathy. Ophthalmologists and oncologists should be aware of these adverse events in women with breast cancer who receive these drugs.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Breast Neoplasms , Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases , Macular Edema , Optic Nerve Diseases , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bridged-Ring Compounds , Child , Docetaxel/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Macular Edema/chemically induced , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Optic Nerve Diseases/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Tamoxifen/adverse effects , Taxoids/adverse effects
16.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 47(12): 2295-2296, 2022 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35906023

Chemotherapy extravasation is a rare but severe cutaneous complication associated with administration of intravenous chemotherapy. Extravasation causes serious disability and diminishes the quality of life in patients with cancer undergoing antineoplastic therapy. Treatment of chemotherapy extravasation is not standardized. We report a patient with paclitaxel extravasation who was successfully treated with corticosteroids.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Paclitaxel , Humans , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials , Skin
17.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 10(4): e00985, 2022 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35811355

Paclitaxel is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. To minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which occur in approximately 16-42% of patients, premedication with dexamethasone, clemastine, and ranitidine was standard of care. As of October 2019, ranitidine is no longer available. We compared the risk of HSRs to paclitaxel with and without premedication with ranitidine, hypothesizing that the incidence of HSRs to paclitaxel will be similar. In this retrospective cohort study, all first-time paclitaxel users in the Groene Hart Hospital were included from January 2019 to August 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of HSRs, using a Student's t-test. One-hundred and eight patients who were first-time users of paclitaxel in the Groene Hart Hospital met the inclusion criteria. Most patients were treated for breast or ovarian cancer, followed by lung cancer. Analysis of all 836 paclitaxel administrations was performed. Following 349 administrations with ranitidine as premedication, eight HSRs occurred (2.3%), while following 487 administrations without ranitidine, 12 HSRs occurred (2.5%), p-value of 0.87. An additional analysis on the occurrence of HSRs per patient was performed: 45 patients received premedication in the form of ranitidine, of which eight patients (17.8%) had a HSR. Sixty-three patients did not receive premedication in the form of ranitidine, of whom 10 (15.8%) had a HSR, p-value of .80. In conclusion, we found no difference in the incidence of HSRs during paclitaxel infusions between patients who received ranitidine as premedication versus those who did not.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Drug Hypersensitivity , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Ranitidine/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
18.
Clin Ter ; 173(4): 377-383, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35857057

Objectives: Nab-paclitaxel is a chemotherapeutic drug used to treat various solid malignant tumors. It was conceived with a solvent free formulation to overcome toxicity events and hypersensitivity reactions associated with paclitaxel. However, it still carries ocular adverse effects. The present review examines nab-paclitaxel related cystoid macular edema (CME) and the available therapeutic options. Materials and Methods: The literature was reviewed on nab-paclitaxel related CME on published articles through January 2021 using the keywords "nab-paclitaxel "and "cystoid macular edema". Results: Bilateral CME is found in patients in treatment with nab-paclitaxel and causes considerable visual acuity decline. In ophthalmology multimodal imaging has an integral role in the diagnostic work up of patients and shows characteristic findings in nab-paclitaxel related CME. The case of a patient with treatment for bilateral CME is presented and analyzed. Conclusions: The preferred management strategy for nab-paclitaxel-related CME is drug cessation that leads to complete resolution of edema. When discontinuation of treatment is not possible due to the systemic conditions of patients, effective alternative therapeutic modalities are topical dorzolamide or steroidal treatment. Given the higher complication hazards of intravitreal therapy topical treatment should be preferred owing to comparable efficacy.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Macular Edema , Neoplasms , Albumins/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Humans , Macular Edema/chemically induced , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Tomography, Optical Coherence
19.
Clin Transl Sci ; 15(7): 1613-1633, 2022 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35506159

Effects of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 genetic polymorphisms on irinotecan-induced severe toxicities in Asian cancer patients are inconclusive. Also, ABCC2 c.3972C>T may affect toxicity of irinotecan. The aim was to assess the aggregated risk of neutropenia or diarrhea in Asian cancer patients taking irinotecan and inherited UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28, or ABCC2 c.3972C>T genetic variants. A PubMed literature search for eligible studies was conducted. Odds ratios (ORs) were measured using RevMan software where p values <0.05 were statistically significant. Patients that inherited both UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 genetic variants (heterozygous: UGT1A1*1/*6 + *1/*28 and homozygous: UGT1A1*6/*6 + *28/*28) were significantly associated with increased risk of neutropenia and diarrhea compared to patients with UGT1A1*1/*1 (neutropenia: OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.97-4.23; p < 0.00001; diarrhea: OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.71-2.99; p < 0.00001). Patients carrying homozygous variants had much stronger effects in developing toxicities (neutropenia: OR 6.23; 95% CI 3.11-12.47; p < 0.00001; diarrhea: OR 3.21; 95% CI 2.13-4.85; p < 0.00001) than those with heterozygous variants. However, patients carrying the ABCC2 c.3972C>T genetic variant were not significantly associated with neutropenia (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.84; p = 0.06) and were significantly associated with a reduction in irinotecan-induced diarrhea (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.81; p = 0.02). Asian cancer patients should undergo screening for both UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 genetic variants to reduce substantially irinotecan-induced severe toxicities.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Diarrhea , Glucuronosyltransferase , Irinotecan , Neoplasms , Neutropenia , Topoisomerase I Inhibitors , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Diarrhea/genetics , Genotype , Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics , Humans , Irinotecan/adverse effects , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Topoisomerase I Inhibitors/adverse effects , Topoisomerase I Inhibitors/therapeutic use
20.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(9): 4191-4198, 2022 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35470452

AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate the rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in patients receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy, with and without a histamine-2 (H2 ) antagonists. METHOD: This prospective, multi-centre, cohort study compared patients receiving paclitaxel treated with premedication regimens containing chlorphenamine, dexamethasone and an H2 antagonist vs patients treated without an H2 antagonist. Rates of HSRs were described and logistic multivariable regression was used to investigate any associations with H2 antagonist treatment, adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 1043 individuals were included in the study; of these, 638 (61%) patients received an H2 antagonist and 405 (49%) were not given an H2 antagonist. Incidence of HSR in the cohort treated with H2 antagonists was 11.31% (n = 70) vs 9.86% (n = 41) in the cohort without. There was no statistically significant difference between the rates of HSR observed in those receiving and not receiving an H2 antagonist (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.65, 1.66, P = .9). CONCLUSIONS: Results presented within the study are consistent with other recently published evidence to suggest that H2 antagonists do not confer any advantage as part of premedication regimens in reducing the incidence of HSR in patients treated with paclitaxel.


Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Drug Hypersensitivity , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Histamine , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Premedication/adverse effects , Premedication/methods , Prospective Studies
...